Intended Vessel Discrepancy

intended vessel discrepancy

There are two main types of bills of lading available on the market, in terms of shipment notations: “Received for shipment…” bill of lading and “Shipped … on board” bill of lading.

If you want to understand, which type of bill of lading you have in your hand, please simply look at the right bottom or right top corner of the bill of lading.

You will (most probably) see a small rectangular, which contains an abstract of contract of carriage.

Please keep in mind that full details of the terms and conditions of the carriage will be placed on the back side of the bill of lading, of course, if it is not a blank-back or short form bill of lading.

  • If the abstract of contract of carriage contains a phrase like “Received by the carrier…“, then the bill of lading is a “Received for shipment…” bill of lading;
  • If the abstract of contract of carriage contains a phrase like “Shipped, in apparent good order and condition…“, then the bill of lading is a “Shipped … on board” bill of lading.

Received for shipment bill of lading confirms that the carrier has taken charge of the goods.

However, received for shipment bills of lading do not confirm that the container has been shipped on board a named vessel. As a result, these kind of bills of lading require an additional “shipped on board” notation.

Because of the fact that the name of the actual vessel is not determined at the time of the issuance of the received for shipment bill of lading, the carrier may define the vessel as an “intended vessel“.

Unfortunately, the letter of credit rules accept intended vessel notation as a discrepancy in the absence of an on board notation.

The only way to get your payment from the issuing bank under letter of credit transaction is to make a discrepancy free presentation. So, you must understand what an intended vessel discrepancy is.

Why Intended Vessel Clause Inserted on the Bill of Lading?

The actual vessel may not be determined when the carrier receives the goods from the shipper, especially in “Received for shipment” types of bills of lading.

It has therefore become common practice to indicate the name of an intended vessel in the bill of lading, thus making it clear that a different vessel finally be selected.

Therefore, the bill of lading, as originally issued, does not indicate that the goods have been shipped on board a named vessel. (Gary Collyer, The Guide to Documentary Credits, 3rd Revision, Page: 205)

What the Letter of Credit Rules Say About Intended Vessel?

According to UCP 600 “If the bill of lading contains the indication “intended vessel” or similar qualification in relation to the name of the vessel, an on board notation indicating the date of shipment and the name of the actual vessel is required.”

Absence of such an on board notation will make the bill of lading discrepant.

Example intended vessel discrepancy on a bill of lading under a letter of credit:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of original bill of lading shipped on board marked freight collect made out to the order of Bank Millennium S.A, Poland notify applicant.

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading among other documents as shown on the below picture:

intended vessel clause

Costs Additional to Freight Discrepancy

costs additional to freight

Letter of credit rules allow transport documents to show costs additional to freight.

However, some banks especially in certain countries, prohibit costs additional to freight to be mentioned on the transport documents, by cancelling the related article of UCP 600.

If a letter of credit indicates that costs additional to freight is not acceptable, then the transport document presented must not indicate that costs additional to the freight have been or will be incurred.

How Could Costs Additional to Freight Discrepancy Occur?

Tere are the three requirements of a costs additional to freight discrepancy.

  1. A letter of credit, that expressly prohibits cost additional to freight and cancels related article of UCP 600.
  2. A transport document, that is presented with a cost additional to freight expression such as FIFO, FILO, FIO etc…
  3. A discrepancy raised by the issuing bank due to the transport document shows charges additional to freight contrary to l/c terms.

Costs Additional to Freight Discrepancy Example:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

46A: Documents Required

  1. Full set of at least 3/3 long form original (clean on board) bill of lading on the printed forms of carrier plus one non-negotiable copy issued or endorsed to the order of Expo Arab Bank Plc, notify applicant showing freight prepaid and showing full name and address of the shipping company agent or his representative in Bahrain.
  2. Bill of lading showing charges additional to the freight mentioned in article 26 (c) of the UCP, 2007 revision, publication no. 600 are not acceptable except where such additional charges are demurrage fees for containers.
  3. Short form or blank back bill of lading are not acceptable.

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading, that contains a clause stating that “Carriage Term: Free In & Liner Out

Bill of Lading

costs additional to freight discrepancy

Discrepancy:

The documents refused by the issuing bank due to the discrepancy indicated on the following advice of refusal.

————————————-Message Header——————————————-
Swift OUTPUT FIN 734 Advice of Refusal
Sender: EXPOBHBMMAN
EXPO ARAB BANK PLC
MANAMA BH

Receiver: IHRKTRISXXX
TURKIYE IHRACAT BANKASI T.A.S
ISTANBUL TR
—————————————-Message Text——————————————-
20: Sender’s TRN
2002RML2AI2A3369

21: Presenting Bank’s Reference
18208L23R109

32A: Date and Amount of Utilization
Date: 28 December 2012
Currency: USD (US DOLLAR)
Amount: #285.600,00#

33A: Total Amount Claimed
Date: 07 January 2013
Currency: USD (US DOLLAR)
Amount: #285. 600,00#

72: Sender to Receiver Information

Documents refused by us due to discrepancies stated below. We notified the applicant, we shall revert upon hearing from them.

77J: Discrepancies

  1. B/L shows additional charges to the freight not authorized under L/C.

77B: Disposal of Documents
/ HOLD /
————————————-Message Trailer——————————————–

Carrier Not Identified and Bill of Lading Not Signed As Per UCP 600 Discrepancy

carrier not identified discrepancy

Bill of lading is a very important transport document, because it is suppose to evidence of contract of carriage, a receipt of goods by the carrier and a document of title to the goods.

In order a bill of lading functions as it is suppose to function, it must be completed and signed by a reliable carrier.

According to the current letter of credit rules a bill of lading must identify the name of the carrier and be signed by carrier, master or their agents.

A bill of lading, however named, must appear to indicate the name of the carrier and be signed by:

  • the carrier or a named agent for or on behalf of the carrier, or
  • the master or a named agent for or on behalf of the master.

If the issuing bank finds out that the name of the carrier not identified on the bill of lading, then the issuing bank will raise a “Carrier Not Identified” discrepancy.

If the issuing bank finds out that the bill of lading has not been signed by the carrier, master or their named agents on behalf of either the carrier or master, then the issuing bank will raise a “Bill of Lading not Signed as per UCP” discrepancy.

  1. Example of Carrier Not Identified Discrepancy:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of shipped on board bill of lading marked freight collect made out to order of Commercial Bank of Kuwait notify Applicant Company with full address and contact details as indicated in the credit.

Bill of Lading

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading in which carrier name not identified. Issuing bank raises carrier not identified discrepancy.

2.Example of Bill of Lading not Signed as per UCP Discrepancy:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of shipped on board bill of lading marked freight prepaid made out to order of Burgan Bank, Kuwait notify Applicant Company with full address and contact details as indicated in the credit.

Bill of Lading

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading, which is signed as seen on the below picture.

bill of lading not signed as per ucp 600 discrepancy

According to letter of credit rules a bill of lading must be signed by the carrier or a named agent for or on behalf of the carrier, or the master or a named agent for or on behalf of the master. Sample bill of lading not signed as per letter of credit rules, UCP 600.

The issuing bank raises bill of lading not signed as per UCP discrepancy.

Unclean Bill of Lading Discrepancy

unclean bill of lading discrepancy

A clean bill of lading is a type of transport document, which bears no clause or notation, which expressly declares a defective condition of the goods and/or the packaging.

Banks can accept only clean transport documents under letters of credit transactions.

Banks do not accept any unclean transport document.

As a result, presentation of an unclean bill of lading would create a discrepancy, in the eyes of the banks.

What makes a bill of lading clean or unclean?

  • An express clause declares a defective condition of the goods makes the bill of lading unclean.
  • An express clause declares a defective condition of the packages of the goods makes the bill of lading unclean.

Please kindly keep in mind that below points do not make a bill of lading unclean.

  • Absence of the word “clean” does not make a bill of lading unclean.
  • Deletion of the word “clean” does not make a bill of lading unclean.

Sample Clauses Which Make a Transport Document Unclean:

  • Packaging is not sufficient for port to port ocean transportation.
  • Goods which improperly stored at the port of loading have been shipped on board partially wet and not in good condition.

Example of an Unclean Bill of Lading Discrepancy:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 45A: Description of Goods and or Services: Fruits

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of clean on board bill of lading marked freight payable at destination made out to order of Bankinter, SA notify Applicant Company with full address and contact details as indicated in the credit.

Bill of Lading

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading with the following clause: Packaging is not sufficient for the sea journey.

Discrepancy: Unclean bill of lading presented.

Reason for Discrepancy: A bank will only accept a clean transport document. A clean transport document is one bearing no clause or notation expressly declaring a defective condition of the goods or their packaging.

How to Prevent an Unclean Bill of Lading Discrepancy:

  • Do not focus on “Clean” word, that might be stated on the credit. A clean bill of lading need not to indicate “clean on board” notation. “Shipped on board” notation is enough.
  • Make sure that, the shipment is effected in a sound way. The goods are packed well, secured inside the container and there is no leakage out of the container.
  • If you are going to make a bulk shipment, make sure that the goods will not be affected from bad weather.
  • Speak with your logistics provider, in advance of the shipment, and learn all necessary precautions that you need to take, in order to prevent an unclean bill of lading issuance.

Partial Shipment Discrepancy

partial shipment discrepancy

The importer and exporter should determine, when signing the sales contract, to allow or prohibit partial shipments.

Partial shipment can be defined as shipping the goods not whole at once, but in more than one smaller shipments.

Partial shipments total may be less than the total contract amount.

The letter of credit rules allow partial shipments and partial drawings. But, in some occasions, issuing banks tend to restrict partial shipments.

In order to understand, whether or not partial shipments are allowed under a documentary credit, you need to look at “Field 43P: Partial Shipments” within the swift message body.

  • Field 43P: Partial Shipments: Allowed means that partial shipments are permitted
  • Field 43P: Partial Shipments: Not Allowed means that partial shipments are not permitted.

If the issuing bank finds out that partial shipments have been effected, although the letter of credit prohibits partial shipments, then the issuing bank will raise a discrepancy, which is known as partial shipments discrepancy.

Sample Partial Shipment Discrepancy on a Bill of Lading under a Letter of Credit:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP 600, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 43P: Partial Shipments: Not Allowed

Field 43T: Transhipment: Not Allowed

Field 45-A: Description of Goods: 24 Pcs of Food Sorting Machinery

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of original bill of lading laden on board marked freight collect made out to the order of HSBC Bank, USA notify applicant.

The beneficiary presented two set of documents containing two bills of lading among other documents with the following data:

partial shipment

Discrepancy: Partial Shipment Effected.

Reason for Discrepancy: The beneficiary presented two sets of documents within the same presentation. The issuing bank determined that partial shipment has been effected on contrary to the letter of credit terms, because goods have been dispatched with two different vessels.

How to Prevent a Partial Shipment Discrepancy?

  1. Check the letter of credit before shipment of goods, in order to determine whether or not partial shipment is prohibited.
  2. If partial shipment is allowed, you can make smaller shipments until you reach total letter of credit amount. Be careful with the latest date of shipment.
  3. If partial shipment is not allowed, but your intention to do so; then you must get in touch with your customer to amend the letter.

Gross Weight is Different on Documents Discrepancy

gross weight discrepancy

In a letter of credit transaction, the gross weight must show the same value on all presented documents.

As an example, the gross weight on the bill of lading must not conflict with the gross weight stated on the packing list, weight list or any other document.

According to the letter of credit rules, a data in a document, when read in context with the credit, the document itself and international standard banking practice, need not be identical to, but must not conflict with, data in that document, any other stipulated document or the credit.

If the issuing bank finds out that the gross weight on bill of lading and packing list do not match, then the issuing bank will raise a discrepancy, which is known as the gross weight is different on the bill of lading than the gross weight stated on the packing list.

Discrepancy Example: Gross Weight is Different on the Bill of Lading Than the Gross Weight Stated on the Packing List under a Letter of Credit:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 43P: Partial Shipments: Allowed

Field 43T: Transhipment: Allowed

Field 45-A: Description of Goods: 24,000,00 KGS Textile Dyeing Chemicals

Field 46A: Documents Required:

  • Full set of original bill of lading laden on board marked freight collect made out to the order of Citibank, USA notify applicant.
  • Packing list one original and one copy.
  • Commercial invoice in three originals.

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading and a packing list among other documents with the following data:

Gross weight on bill of lading and packing list are inconsistent
Discrepancy Example: Bill of Lading and Packing List Details

Discrepancy: Gross weight on the bill of lading and packing list is inconsistent.

Reason for Discrepancy: Data in a document, when read in context with the credit, the document itself and international standard banking practice, need not be identical to, but must not conflict with, data in that document, any other stipulated document or the credit.

Late Shipment Discrepancy

late shipment discrepancy

Documentary credits often include a “latest date of shipment”. Latest date of shipment is one of the most important definitions in commercial documentary credits.

As a beneficiary, if you are obligated to make a shipment  under a commercial letter of credit, and need to present a transport document; such as a port-to-port marine bill of lading, then you must complete the shipment before the latest date of shipment stated in the credit.

Which means that, the date of shipment indicated on the bill of lading must not show a date, that is after the latest date of shipment marked in the credit.

If you fail to complete your shipment before the allowed time frame, then you will get a late shipment discrepancy from the issuing bank.

After the issuing bank determines that your presentation is not complying, you can reach to the payment only after applicant accepts the discrepancies

Sample Late Shipment Discrepancy under a Letter Of Credit:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 44C: Latest Date of Shipment: 141031

Field 44E: Port of Loading/Airport of Departure: Port of Ningbo, China

Field 44F: Port of Discharge/Airport of Destination: Port of Auckland, New Zealand

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of original bill of lading clean on board established to the order of Societe Generale Algerie Spa notify applicant marked freight prepaid.

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading with the following data:

Bill of Lading

Port of Loading: Port of Ningbo, China

Port of Discharge: Port of Auckland, New Zealand

Bill of Lading: The bill of lading is dated 01.November.2014. In addition, it contains an on-board notation as follows: “Shipped on board : 01.November.2014”.

Discrepancy: Marine bill of lading shows a late shipment. Both bill of lading date and on board notation date indicate a late shipment. Date of shipment falls outside the allowed shipment period.

Reason for Discrepancy: If the letter of credit requires a presentation one of the transport documents as indicated in UCP 600, the date of shipment stated on the transport document must not be showing a later date than the latest date of shipment stated in the letter of credit.

shipped on board letter of credit

Bill of lading shows a late shipment as date of shipment is a later date than the latest date of shipment indicated in the letter of credit.

Port of Discharge Different Than Letter of Credit Discrepancy

port of discharge discrepancy

A bill of lading is a generic term for a transport document, that covers transport by sea from a port of loading to a port of discharge.

Port of discharge can be defined as a port, where a vessel will unload its cargo, from where the cargo will be dispatched further to their final consignees.

Port of discharge, as stated by the letter of credit, should appear in the port of discharge field within a bill of lading.

If the issuing bank finds out that a port to port shipment ends in a different port of discharge than what is indicated in the letter of credit, then the issuing bank will raise a discrepancy, which is known as port of discharge different than letter of credit discrepancy.

Sample Port of Discharge Different Than Letter of Credit Discrepancy under a Letter of Credit:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 44E: Port of Loading/Airport of Departure: Port of Marseille, France

Field 44F: Port of Discharge/Airport of Destination: Port of Incheon, South Korea

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of marine bills of lading marked shipped on board issued or endorsed to the order of Kookmin Bank showing freight prepaid, notify applicant and showing the following details: Full applicant name, address as indicated in field 50.

The beneficiary presented a bill of lading with the following data:

Bill of Lading

Port of Loading: Port of Marseille, France

Port of Discharge: Port of Ulsan, South Korea

Discrepancy: Marine bill of lading shows a port of discharge different than what is stated in the letter of credit. Port of discharge should have been Port of Incheon, South Korea, but it was stated as Port of Ulsan, South Korea, which is not as per letter of credit conditions.

Reason for Discrepancy: A bill of lading is to indicate the port of discharge stated in the credit. The named port of discharge, as required by the credit, should appear in the port of discharge field on a bill of lading.

Required Port of Discharge : Port of Incheon

port of discharge incheon

Wrong Port of Discharge : Port of Ulsan, S.Korea

port of discharge ulsan

Port of Loading Different Than Letter of Credit Discrepancy

port of loading discrepancy

A bill of lading is a generic term for a transport document, that covers transport by sea from a port of loading to a port of discharge.

All shipments, that covered under a bill of lading, must be made between the port of loading and port of discharge, which are stated in the letter of credit.

If the issuing bank finds out that the shipment is effected from a different port of loading than what is stated in the letter of credit, then the issuing bank will raise a discrepancy, which is known as port of loading different than letter of credit discrepancy.

Sample Port of Loading Different Than Letter of Credit Discrepancy under a Letter Of Credit:

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCPURR latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 44E: Port of Loading/Airport of Departure:
Port of Haifa, Israel

Field 44F: Port of Discharge/Airport of Destination:
Port of Toronto, Canada

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of marine bills of lading marked shipped on board issued or endorsed to the order of Royal Bank of Canada showing freight payable at destination and notify applicant and showing the following details: Full applicant name, address as indicated in field 50.

The beneficiary has presented the bill of lading with the following data:

Bill of Lading

Port of Loading: Port of Ashdod, Israel

Port of Discharge: Port of Toronto, Canada

Discrepancy: Marine bill of lading shows a port of loading different than what is stated in the letter of credit. Port of loading should have been Port of Haifa, Israel but it was stated as Port of Ashdod, Israel which is not as per letter of credit conditions.

Reason for Discrepancy: A bill of lading is to indicate the port of loading stated in the credit. The named port of loading, as required by the credit, should appear in the port of loading field on a bill of lading.

Required Port of Loading : Port of Haifa, Israel

port of loading discrepancy

Wrong Port of Loading : Port of Ashdod, Israel

port of loading discrepancy

Discrepancies

discrepancies

The issuing bank or the confirming bank must pay the credit amount to the beneficiary, when they determine that the presentation is complying.

The complying presentation means is that the presentation with zero discrepancies.

If, the issuing bank or the confirming finds at least one discrepancy, then the presentation becomes discrepant.

Under a discrepant presentation, the beneficiary can get the payment, only if the applicant accepts the discrepant documents.

On this post, I am going to explain discrepancies in letters of credit.

Firstly, I will make the definition. Secondly, I will disclose links for discrepancies for each document type. At later stages of the post, I will discuss how to deal with the letter of credit, in order to make discrepancy free presentations.

Definition: Discrepancy can be defined as an error or defect, according to the issuing bank, in the presented documents compared with the documentary credit, the UCP 600 rules or other documents that have been presented under the same letter of credit.

Transport Document Discrepancies

Commercial Document Discrepancies

Official Document Discrepancies

Insurance Document Discrepancies

  • Insurance Policy Discrepancies

Perhaps, discrepancy is one of the most complicated and “blurred” field in all letters of credit terminology.

The advising bank checks the documents and finds the presentation complying, then dispatches the documents to the issuing bank.

This time, the issuing bank checks the same documents and comes back with a swift message, mentioning couple of discrepancies.

How Could This Have Been Possible?

How could one bank finds multiple discrepancies in a set of documents, while the same documents are found to be complying by another bank.

Alleged Discrepancies and ICC Opinions:

Almost all of the ICC opinions issued so far are related to complaints about “alleged discrepancies”.

What we can see from the results of the ICC opinions is that ICC Banking Committee does not agree with banks in most cases.

Definition or Lack of Definition:

It is strange, but there is no definition of a discrepancy in the letter of credit rules.

Is it too simple to be forgotten? Or too complicated to define? What is the definition of a discrepancy according the UCP 600 rules?

Inconsistency in Application:

Discrepancies varies from country to country, bank to bank, even more; document checker to document checker.

Let me give you a real life example here.

Couple of years ago, I have presented documents to a confirming bank. The presentation has been made under a set of letters of credit, which contain 10-15 pcs of independent letters of credit.

All of these small amount independent letters of credit have the same text and having the same conditions.

Description of goods, port of loading, port of discharge, additional conditions all were the same.

Just, the latest date of shipment and expiry date were changing form one lc to another.

First 3 presentations were found to be complying by the confirming bank. But on the 4th presentation, we received a swift message “MT 734 Advice of a Refusal” indicating a discrepancy on the certificate of origin.

Lessons learned.

Discrepancies can be changed from country to country, bank to bank, document checker to document checker and presentation to presentation.

and here are the results:

According to ICC Trade Finance Surveys, on average, %70 of letter of credit presentations are found to be discrepant on first presentation.

This is a very frustrating outcome, and has a huge negative impact on everyone in letter of credit business.

Why Banks Find too much Discrepancies on the Documents:

  • Letter of credit rules are often find to be very complicated and hard to understand by exporters and importers.
  • Most of the small and medium scale export and import companies do not have enough resources to hire a letter of credit specialist in their organizations.
  • Exporters and importers do not give enough respect to letter of credit rules and standard banking practices. Exporters and importers think that, they can handle letters of credit with ease on their way. However, the fact is different. Letters of credit have very strict rules to follow.
  • Exporters do not allocate enough time to understand the letter of credit text, before starting to production and shipment.
  • Some banks open overdetailed letters of credit. Sometimes we see that banks demand almost impossible conditions from the beneficiaries on their letters of credit texts.
  • Some banks issue foggy (not clear) letters of credit.
  • Some banks examine documents not as per UCP 600 and ISBP 745.

What can be Done to Prevent Discrepant Presentations:

Pre – Document Preparation Stage:

  • Keep Your Relationship with Your Customer Close: Please keep in mind that, whatever preventive steps you may take, it is highly likely that you will be facing a discrepancy on one of the documents, that you have submitted. So, it would be very wise for you to keep your relations close with your customer.
  • Learn the Rules: Before entering a letter of credit transaction, you need to learn the letter of credit rules very well. You should buy one original copy of current letter of credit rules book, UCP 600. Please follow this link to buy a UCP 600 online.
  • Learn the International International Standard Banking Practices: Before entering a letter of credit transaction, you also need to be familiarized with the International Standard Banking Practices. In order to do that, you should buy one original copy of current International Standard Banking Practices book. Please follow this link to learn more about International Standard Banking Practices.
  • Check the Credit: You must check the letter of credit as early as you can, before starting to the production. As one of the letter of credit expert indicated “you can not solve lc problems at the presentation stage.” The earlier you are starting to work on the letter of credit text, the better it would be.
  • Demand a Draft Letter of Credit: Demanding a letter of credit draft from your customer, before having the original letter of credit issued, would be a wise move. This will save you from additional letter of credit fees; such as amendment fees and amendment advising fees.Work on this letter of credit draft carefully.
  • Check Field 46-A: Check required documents field one by one. Make sure that, you can supply all the required documents, that has been requested under this field.
  • Check Field 47-A: Check additional conditions field one by one. Make sure that, conditions stated in this field are doable, and are not going to create any problems for you on the presentation stage.
  • Demand Amendment: If you find a condition or clause that you can not comply with, get in touch with your buyer to amend the letter of credit.
  • Demand Clarification: If you can not understand a condition or sentence on the letter of credit text, then you should get in touch with the issuing bank for clarification.

Document Preparation Stage:

  • Complete the documents as requested by the credit. Make sure that, you also take into account the letter of credit rules and international standard banking practices when preparing the documents.
  • Make sure that, signatures, authentication are made by requested persons or institutions.
  • Make sure that, you will be presented all required documents without any absence.
  • Make sure that, you presented correct number of originals and copies as requested by the credit.
  • Make sure that, the dates on the documents are in accordance with the dates mentioned on the credit. For example, you would not be making either a late shipment or a late presentation.
  • Make sure that, you will collect all requested documents by the credit as soon as you make the shipment. Once you collect all the documents, you need to make the presentation without losing any time.

After Presentation Stage :

Follow the situation of the documents day by day with the advising bank. Give necessary information to your buyer. And stay in alert mode, until you receive your payment.