Inspection Certificate Discrepancies

inspection certificate discrepancies

On this page you can find most common discrepancies related to the inspection certificate, which is issued under a typical letter of credit transaction.

Discrepancy can be defined as an error or defect, according to the issuing bank, in the presented documents compared with the documentary credit, the UCP 600 rules or other documents that have been presented under the same letter of credit.

Inspection in international trade can be defined as a process of checking the quality of goods against the contractual requirements.

Inspection certificate is the document that is usually issued by the inspection company after completion of the inspection.

Inspection certificate provides data on the result of the inspection.

Inspection Certificate Discrepancies

  • Inspection Certificate Not Issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of Credit
  • Total Quantity Indicated on the Certificate of Inspection is not in Accordance with the Bill of Lading and Certificate of Origin
  • Inspection Certificate Is not Dated within the Timeline Required by the Documentary Credit
  • Inspection Certificate Identifies Different Goods Inspected Inconsistent with Those Described by Commercial Invoices
  • Inspection Certificate Indicates That Goods Do not Comply with the specifications
  • Inspection Certificate Indicates That Packing is not as per L/C.
  • Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate Shows Date of Inspection a Later Date Than Date of Shipment

Important Points Regarding the Inspection Certificates under Letter of Credit Rules:

  • When a credit requires the presentation of an inspection certificate, this will be satisfied by the presentation of a signed document titled as inspection certificate, or bearing a similar title or even untitled, which fulfills its function by certifying the result of the indicated action, for example, the results of the inspection.
  • When a credit requires the presentation of a pre-shipment inspection certificate, which relates to an action required to take place on or prior to the date of shipment, the certificate must indicate:

a. an issuance date of the certificate is no later than the date of shipment; or
b. stating that the inspection of goods took place prior to, or on the date of shipment,
c. the exact title of the required certificate, such as, “Pre‐shipment Inspection Certificate”.

  • An inspection certificate should be issued by the institution stated in the credit.
  • When a letter of credit does not state the title of an issuer, any institution including the beneficiary could issue the inspection certificate.
  • When a letter of credit indicates specific requirements with respect to inspection, the data regarding the inspection mentioned on the inspection certificate should comply with those requirements.

Inspection Certificate Not issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of Credit Discrepancy

inspection certificate not issued as per letter of credit

Inspection in international trade can be defined as a process of checking the quality of goods against the contractual requirements.

Because, the importer and exporter are located in different countries, and they are usually living very away from each other, as a result it would not be feasible for the importer to send someone to check the quality of goods for each shipment.

If the importer (the applicant) is not able to send a person he trusts to the place of shipment, he can ask an internationally recognized inspection company, such as the Geneva-based Société Générale Surveillance (SGS) to perform the inspection required.

The applicant will instruct the inspection company as to the manner in which it is to check the goods and what they must look for. (1)

Third party inspection services in international trade can be grouped under two main categories.

  1. Previous Shipment Inspections, which are performed before the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory and
  2. Post Shipment Inspections, which are performed after the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory.

types of inspection

Inspections, which are performed before the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory are as follows:

  1. Pre-Production Inspection (PPI)
  2. During Production Inspection (DUPRO)
  3. Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI)
  4. Container Loading Supervision (CLS) or Container Loading Inspection (CLI)

Inspections, which are performed after the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory are as follows:

  1. Post-Shipment Inspection (2)

Inspection certificate is the document that is issued by the inspection company after completion of the inspection. Inspection certificate provides data on the result of the inspection.

The inspection certificate should be issued by the party stated in the letter of credit.

According to the letter of credit rules and standard banking practices an inspection certificate, however named, must appear to be issued and signed by the entity stated in the letter of credit.

For example, if the letter of credit requires that pre-shipment inspection certificate should be issued by SGS, Intertek or CCIC Inspection Company, the inspection certificate that has been presented by the beneficiary must be issued and signed by one of these independent inspection companies.

If issuing bank finds out that an inspection certificate has not been issued and signed by the entity as required by the letter of credit, then the issuing bank will raise a discrepancy, which is known as inspection certificate not issued and signed by the party required by the letter of credit.

Letter of Credit Discrepancy Example: Inspection Certificate Not Issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of Credit

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 45A: Description of Goods and or Services: 20 mtons of %100 organic Italian Extra Virgin olive Oil. Delivery Terms: CIF Port of Newark, USA Incoterms 2010.

Field 46A: Documents Required:

  1. Beneficiary’s dated and manually signed commercial invoice in duplicates bearing full description of goods and its quantity, net and gross weight, unit and total price.
  2. Insurance policy covering all risks showing claims payable in USA.
  3. 3/3 full set original clean bills of lading made out to order of issuing bank, notify applicant company indicating freight prepaid stating the name, telephone and fax numbers of carrier’s agent in port of discharge. Bill of lading should evidence shipments made in refrigerated 40′ closed containers.
  4. The original inspection certificate issued not prior to marine bill of lading date by S.G.S or its authorized agent on S.G.S letter head certifying that the goods shipped/inspected are in conformity with the quality, quantity, and packing of the goods loaded are strictly complying with specifications of the goods indicated in the relative Purchasing Instruction, the terms of the l/c and all subsequent amendments as presented to S.G.S by the importer. The inspection certificate shall verify that the goods are in conformity with USDA organic food standards.

The beneficiary presented an insurance policy as shown on the below picture.

Inspection Certificate

Discrepancy Example: Inspection Certificate Not issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of CreditDiscrepancy: Inspection certificate should have been issued by S.G.S or its authorized agent on behalf of S.G.S inspection company. On the other hand, the inspection certificate has been issued by another inspection company.

Reason for Discrepancy: According to letter of credit rules and standard banking practices an inspection certificate, however named, must appear to be issued and signed by the entity stated in the letter of credit.

References:

  1. Documentary Credits in Practice, Second edition 2009, Nordea, Page:174, Reached: 07.March.2018
  2. What is a Pre-Production Inspection (PPI)?, www.advancedontrade.com, Reached: 07.March.2018

Discrepancies

discrepancies

The issuing bank or the confirming bank must pay the credit amount to the beneficiary, when they determine that the presentation is complying.

The complying presentation means is that the presentation with zero discrepancies.

If, the issuing bank or the confirming finds at least one discrepancy, then the presentation becomes discrepant.

Under a discrepant presentation, the beneficiary can get the payment, only if the applicant accepts the discrepant documents.

On this post, I am going to explain discrepancies in letters of credit.

Firstly, I will make the definition. Secondly, I will disclose links for discrepancies for each document type. At later stages of the post, I will discuss how to deal with the letter of credit, in order to make discrepancy free presentations.

Definition: Discrepancy can be defined as an error or defect, according to the issuing bank, in the presented documents compared with the documentary credit, the UCP 600 rules or other documents that have been presented under the same letter of credit.

Transport Document Discrepancies

Commercial Document Discrepancies

Official Document Discrepancies

Insurance Document Discrepancies

  • Insurance Policy Discrepancies

Perhaps, discrepancy is one of the most complicated and “blurred” field in all letters of credit terminology.

The advising bank checks the documents and finds the presentation complying, then dispatches the documents to the issuing bank.

This time, the issuing bank checks the same documents and comes back with a swift message, mentioning couple of discrepancies.

How Could This Have Been Possible?

How could one bank finds multiple discrepancies in a set of documents, while the same documents are found to be complying by another bank.

Alleged Discrepancies and ICC Opinions:

Almost all of the ICC opinions issued so far are related to complaints about “alleged discrepancies”.

What we can see from the results of the ICC opinions is that ICC Banking Committee does not agree with banks in most cases.

Definition or Lack of Definition:

It is strange, but there is no definition of a discrepancy in the letter of credit rules.

Is it too simple to be forgotten? Or too complicated to define? What is the definition of a discrepancy according the UCP 600 rules?

Inconsistency in Application:

Discrepancies varies from country to country, bank to bank, even more; document checker to document checker.

Let me give you a real life example here.

Couple of years ago, I have presented documents to a confirming bank. The presentation has been made under a set of letters of credit, which contain 10-15 pcs of independent letters of credit.

All of these small amount independent letters of credit have the same text and having the same conditions.

Description of goods, port of loading, port of discharge, additional conditions all were the same.

Just, the latest date of shipment and expiry date were changing form one lc to another.

First 3 presentations were found to be complying by the confirming bank. But on the 4th presentation, we received a swift message “MT 734 Advice of a Refusal” indicating a discrepancy on the certificate of origin.

Lessons learned.

Discrepancies can be changed from country to country, bank to bank, document checker to document checker and presentation to presentation.

and here are the results:

According to ICC Trade Finance Surveys, on average, %70 of letter of credit presentations are found to be discrepant on first presentation.

This is a very frustrating outcome, and has a huge negative impact on everyone in letter of credit business.

Why Banks Find too much Discrepancies on the Documents:

  • Letter of credit rules are often find to be very complicated and hard to understand by exporters and importers.
  • Most of the small and medium scale export and import companies do not have enough resources to hire a letter of credit specialist in their organizations.
  • Exporters and importers do not give enough respect to letter of credit rules and standard banking practices. Exporters and importers think that, they can handle letters of credit with ease on their way. However, the fact is different. Letters of credit have very strict rules to follow.
  • Exporters do not allocate enough time to understand the letter of credit text, before starting to production and shipment.
  • Some banks open overdetailed letters of credit. Sometimes we see that banks demand almost impossible conditions from the beneficiaries on their letters of credit texts.
  • Some banks issue foggy (not clear) letters of credit.
  • Some banks examine documents not as per UCP 600 and ISBP 745.

What can be Done to Prevent Discrepant Presentations:

Pre – Document Preparation Stage:

  • Keep Your Relationship with Your Customer Close: Please keep in mind that, whatever preventive steps you may take, it is highly likely that you will be facing a discrepancy on one of the documents, that you have submitted. So, it would be very wise for you to keep your relations close with your customer.
  • Learn the Rules: Before entering a letter of credit transaction, you need to learn the letter of credit rules very well. You should buy one original copy of current letter of credit rules book, UCP 600. Please follow this link to buy a UCP 600 online.
  • Learn the International International Standard Banking Practices: Before entering a letter of credit transaction, you also need to be familiarized with the International Standard Banking Practices. In order to do that, you should buy one original copy of current International Standard Banking Practices book. Please follow this link to learn more about International Standard Banking Practices.
  • Check the Credit: You must check the letter of credit as early as you can, before starting to the production. As one of the letter of credit expert indicated “you can not solve lc problems at the presentation stage.” The earlier you are starting to work on the letter of credit text, the better it would be.
  • Demand a Draft Letter of Credit: Demanding a letter of credit draft from your customer, before having the original letter of credit issued, would be a wise move. This will save you from additional letter of credit fees; such as amendment fees and amendment advising fees.Work on this letter of credit draft carefully.
  • Check Field 46-A: Check required documents field one by one. Make sure that, you can supply all the required documents, that has been requested under this field.
  • Check Field 47-A: Check additional conditions field one by one. Make sure that, conditions stated in this field are doable, and are not going to create any problems for you on the presentation stage.
  • Demand Amendment: If you find a condition or clause that you can not comply with, get in touch with your buyer to amend the letter of credit.
  • Demand Clarification: If you can not understand a condition or sentence on the letter of credit text, then you should get in touch with the issuing bank for clarification.

Document Preparation Stage:

  • Complete the documents as requested by the credit. Make sure that, you also take into account the letter of credit rules and international standard banking practices when preparing the documents.
  • Make sure that, signatures, authentication are made by requested persons or institutions.
  • Make sure that, you will be presented all required documents without any absence.
  • Make sure that, you presented correct number of originals and copies as requested by the credit.
  • Make sure that, the dates on the documents are in accordance with the dates mentioned on the credit. For example, you would not be making either a late shipment or a late presentation.
  • Make sure that, you will collect all requested documents by the credit as soon as you make the shipment. Once you collect all the documents, you need to make the presentation without losing any time.

After Presentation Stage :

Follow the situation of the documents day by day with the advising bank. Give necessary information to your buyer. And stay in alert mode, until you receive your payment.