Presentation – Top 10 Letter of Credit Discrepancies

Presentation - Top 10 Letter of Credit Discrepancies

What is a Discrepancy?

What is a discrepancy?

  • There is no definition of a discrepancy under the current letter of credit rules, UCP 600.
  • Discrepancy can be defined as inconsistencies on the documents which are presented to the banks under letters of credit transactions.

Prevalence of Discrepancies

  • Banks find discrepancies on most of the letter of credit presentations.
  • According to ICC Trade Finance Surveys on average %70 of letters of credit presentations found to be discrepant on first presentation.

Distribution of Discrepancies

Importance of most common discrepancies

  • This presentation explains the most frequently seen discrepancy types.
  • By understanding these discrepancies, you will be able to prevent possible grounds for refusal of the documents.

Most Common Discrepancy 1: Inconsistency in Documents

Data on each document presented under a letter of credit must be consistent to each other. UCP 600 states that "Data in a document, when read in context with the credit, the document itself and international standard banking practice, need not be identical to, but must not conflict with, data in that document, any other stipulated document or the credit.”

  • Data on each document presented under a letter of credit must be consistent to each other.
  • UCP 600 states that “Data in a document, when read in context with the credit, the document itself and international standard banking practice, need not be identical to, but must not conflict with, data in that document, any other stipulated document or the credit.”

Most Common Discrepancy 1: Inconsistency in Documents

Most common discrepancy 1 : Inconsistency in Documents

Most Common Discrepancy 2: Incorrect Data

 incorrect data discrepancy

  • UCP 600 states that ” A nominated bank acting on its nomination, a confirming bank, if any, and the issuing bank must examine a presentation to determine, on the basis of the documents alone, whether or not the documents appear on their face to constitute a complying presentation.”
  • If the exporter enters a data in any requested document resulting a conflict with the credit terms and conditions, then the exporter will receive an incorrect data discrepancy.

Most Common Discrepancy 2: Incorrect Data

Port of Loading Different Than Letter of Credit Discrepancy

Example : Letter of credit asking a bill of lading which should be showing “Port of Loading” as “Newark Port USA” as below,

44E: Port of Loading/Airport of Departure
NEWARK PORT USA

• If presented bill of lading is showing “Port of Loading” as “Port of Philadelphia USA”,
then the beneficiary will be receiving an incorrect data discrepancy from the issuing bank.

Most Common Discrepancy 3: Late Shipment

late shipment discrepancyLatest date of shipment is the latest date for loading on board/dispatch/taking in charge.

There are two important point needs to be taken care of:

  • Latest date of shipment is the date of the transport document not your loading date from your factory. For example, if credit requires of a bill of lading as a transport document;  the latest date of shipment is the on board date of bill of lading.
  • Latest date of shipment will apply only if the credit request presentation of a transport document.

Most Common Discrepancy 3: Late Shipment

late shipment example

• Example : Letter of credit requires presentation of a bill of lading with the details below.

46A: Documents Required

3/3 Original bill of lading clean and shipped on board to the order of Banque al Baraka d`Algeria, notify applicant marked freight prepaid.

44C: Latest Date of Shipment
121210 (Should be read as 10.December.2012)

•The beneficiary has to present a bill of lading showing “ship on board” date earlier than the latest date of shipment indicated in the letter of credit.

Most Common Discrepancy 4: Late Presentation

late presentation

Most Common Discrepancy 4: Late Presentation

late presentation discrepancy example

  • Example : Letter of credit requires presentation of a bill of lading with the details below.

31D: Date and Place of Expiry
130121 China

46A: Documents Required
Full set of clean shipped on board ocean bills of lading drawn to the order of United Bank ltd, Sana’a Yemen showing freight prepaid and marked notify Applicant.

48 : Period for Presentation
21 Days

  • Exporter has to complete the presentation not later than 21 days after the bill of lading date.

Most Common Discrepancy 5: Letter of Credit Expired

letter of credit expired

  • According to current letter of credit rules except as provided in sub-article 29 (a), a presentation by or on behalf of the beneficiary must be made on or before the expiry date.
  • If the beneficiary makes the presentation after the expiry date, then he will likely to receive a letter of credit expired discrepancy.
  • Normally banks should not accept any document that has been presented after the expiry date of the credit. However, banks mostly prefer leaving the ultimate decision to the applicants on this regard and evaluate late presentation after the expiry date as a discrepancy.

Most Common Discrepancy 6: Absence of Documents

absence of documentsThe exporter has to present exact number of documents as it is requested under the letter of credit. For example, if the credit requires:

  • a. “Invoice”, “One Invoice” or “Invoice in 1 copy”, it will be understood to be a requirement for an original invoice.
  • b. “Invoice in 4 copies”, it will be satisfied by the presentation of at least one original and the remaining number as copies of an invoice.
  • c.“One copy of Invoice”, it will be satisfied by presentation of either a copy or an original of an invoice.

Most Common Discrepancy 7: Carrier not defined on the bill of lading / bill of lading signed by Improper Authority

Carrier not defined on the bill of lading

  • UCP 600 Article 20 indicates that :

A bill of lading, however named, must appear to:

i. indicate the name of the carrier and be signed by:

– the carrier or a named agent for or on behalf of the carrier, or
– the master or a named agent for or on behalf of the master.

  • Any signature by the carrier, master or agent must be identified as that of the carrier, master or agent.
  • Any signature by an agent must indicate whether the agent has signed
    for or on behalf of the carrier or for or on behalf of the master.

Most Common Discrepancy 8: Incorrect Description of Goods

Incorrect Description of Goods• The description of the goods, services or performance in the invoice must correspond with the description in the credit.
• The description of goods, services or performance in an invoice must reflect what has actually been shipped or provided.
• If a trade term is part of the goods description in the credit, or stated in connection with the amount, the invoice must state the trade term specified, and if the description provides the source of the trade term, the same source must be identified (e.g., a credit term “CIF Singapore Incoterms 2000” would not be satisfied by “CIF Singapore Incoterms”).

Most Common Discrepancy 9: Incorrect Endorsement / Absence of Endorsement

Incorrect Endorsement / Absence of Endorsement

  • If a bill of lading is issued to order or to order of the shipper, it must be endorsed by the shipper.
  • The draft must be endorsed, if necessary.
  • If a signature or endorsement is required to be on a document consisting of more than one page, the signature is normally placed on the first or last page of the document, but unless the credit or the document itself indicates where a signature or endorsement is to
    appear, the signature or endorsement may appear anywhere on the document.

Most Common Discrepancy 10: Partial Shipment or Transshipment Effected Despite L/C Terms

Partial shipment or transshipment effected despite L/C terms

  • Transhipment means unloading from one means of conveyance and reloading to another means of conveyance. (whether or not in different modes of transport)
  • Partial shipment means shipment of goods not whole in one lot, but in more than one lots.
  • If the letter of credit prohibits partial shipments and/or transhipment, the exporter must act accordingly.
  • Please keep in mind that the letter of credit rules allow transhipments under certain circumstances even if the credit prohibits so.

What Happens If a Letter of Credit Calls For a Wrong Incoterms?

letter of credit calls for a wrong Incoterms

Daily practice shows us that Incoterms are not used in a correct way as per ICC rules.

Exporters and importers frequently use wrong incoterms in their sales contracts.

These kinds of mistakes would be very evident, especially when the parties decide to use a trade term with an unsuitable mode of transport.

On today’s post I try to explain the consequences of using a wrong incoterms under a letter of credit transaction.

Understanding the Incoterms:

Incoterms are the short form of International Commercial Terms and they are published by Commercial Law and Practice Commission of ICC.

Latest version of Incoterms rules are called Incoterms 2010 which has been in force since 01.01.2011.

According to Incoterms 2010 rules

  • FAS FREE ALONGSIDE SHIP (… named port of shipment),
  • FOB FREE ON BOARD (… named port of shipment),
  • CFR COST AND FREIGHT (… named port of destination) and
  • CIF COST, INSURANCE AND FREIGHT (… named port of destination) can only be used in a port-to-port sea transportation.

Remaining 7 seven Incoterms,

  • EXW EX WORKS (… named place),
  • FCA FREE CARRIER (… named place),
  • CPT CARRIAGE PAID TO (… named place of destination),
  • CIP CARRIAGE AND INSURANCE PAID TO (… named place of destination),
  • DAT DELIVERED AT TERMINAL,
  • DAP DELIVERED AT PLACE and
  • DDP DELIVERED DUTY PAID (… named place of destination) can be used in all modes of transport including port-to-port sea transportation.
incoterms 2010 classification
Incoterms 2010 Classification

But what happens if a letter of credit calls for a wrong incoterms such as FOB Singapore Changi Airport Incoterms 2010 or CIF Tokyo Airport Incoterms 2010?

According to ICC Banking Commission the exporter must fulfill the conditions stated in the letter of credit.

Even if a wrong Incoterms has been used in the letter of credit, the exporter should use this wrong trade term without making any corrections, otherwise issuing banks will refuse his presentation and he may be having difficulties to receive his payment under L/C.

Example 1:

Letter of Credit:

45A: Description of Goods &/or Services
CRUSHING PLANT. AS PER PROFORMA INVOICE NO.:P-111-7 R02 DATED 03/07/2012 FOB Singapore Changi Airport Incoterms 2010

Commercial Invoice :
CRUSHING PLANT. AS PER PROFORMA INVOICE NO.:P-111-7 R02 DATED 03/07/2012 FCA Singapore Changi Airport Incoterms 2010

Reason for Discrepancy: Trade terms stated in the commercial invoice is not consistent with the letter of credit.

Example 2:

Letter of Credit:

45A: Description of Goods &/or Services
6480CARTONS PREMIUM BRAND A10 CANNED PINEAPPLE CHUNKS IN NATURAL JUICE CIF NEWYORK PORT USA INCOTERMS 2000

Commercial Invoice:
6480CARTONS PREMIUM BRAND A10 CANNED PINEAPPLE CHUNKS IN NATURAL JUICE DAT NEWYORK PORT USA INCOTERMS 2010

Reason for Discrepancy: Trade terms stated in the commercial invoice is not consistent with the letter of credit.

Top 10 Letter of Credit Discrepancies

Top 10 Letter of Credit Discrepancies

Discrepancy can be defined as an error or defect, according to the issuing bank, in the presented documents compared to the documentary credit, the UCP 600 rules or other documents that have been presented under the same letter of credit.

According to the LC Market Intelligence Survey conducted by DC-Pro in year 2005 the average discrepancy rate on first time presentations under export letters of credit is 56%.

Although the report is quite out-dated, the figures are presumably almost identical today.

Discrepancies create problems especially for the exporters.

Once the documents are rejected, the issuing banks can only pay the credit amount, if and only if the importers accept the discrepancies.

Leaving the payment decision to the importers’ hands is a great deal of frustration for the exporters.

There are many reasons why exporters present discrepant documents, but the most important ones are:

  • lack of knowledge,
  • could not understand the letter of credit mechanism and
  • underestimating the risk factors associated with the letter of credit transaction.

On this page, you can find 10 most frequently seen discrepancies with examples in letters of credit.

Discrepancy Number 1 : Inconsistency in Documents

UCP 600 states that “Data in a document, when read in context with the credit, the document itself and international standard banking practice, need not be identical to, but must not conflict with, data in that document, any other stipulated document or the credit.

So if banks find inconsistency between documents, they raise a discrepancy.

Discrepancy Number 2 : Incorrect Data

Information any one of the document presented is not comply with the letter of credit terms and conditions.

Banks examine the documents under a letter of credit according to the letter of credit rules in order to determine whether the presentation is complying or not.

According to Article 2, a complying presentation means a presentation in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit, the applicable provisions of the UCP 600 and international standard banking practice.

As a result if banks find out that at least one of the letter of credit condition is not indicated on the presented documents, they raise a discrepancy.

Discrepancy Number 3 : Late Shipment

Goods shipped after the permitted shipment date or period.

If date of the transport document such as the bill of lading date corresponds to a later date than the latest date of shipment stipulated in the credit, then banks raise the late shipment discrepancy.

Example: Multimodal Bill of Lading Late Shipment Discrepancy

Discrepancy Number 4 : Late Presentation

Documents presented later than 21 days after shipment or after the number of dates stipulated in the letter of credit.

If the credit is silent on the latest date of presentation, then you have to present your letter of credit documents within 21 days after “the date of shipment”.

But please keep in mind that this period can be shorten by the credit. As a result you need to read your credit very carefully in order to determine your presentation period.

Discrepancy Number 5 : Letter of Credit Expired

Documents presented after the letter of credit has expired.

Normally banks should not accept any documents that have been presented after the expiry date of the credit.

However, banks left the final decision to the applicants on this regard by evaluating the late presentation as a discrepancy.

Discrepancy Number 6 : Absence of Documents

Documents required by the letters credit is missing. Missing document discrepancy may also cover insufficient number of original documents presentation.

For example, the UCP 600 demands presentation of all original insurance documents if the insurance document states that it is issued more than one original.

If it is clear on the insurance document that it is issued in two originals, then the beneficiary has to present both originals of the insurance documents. If the beneficiary presents only one original instead of two originals, then the issuing bank raises absence of documents discrepancy.

Example: All Originals of Insurance Policies Have Not Been Presented Discrepancy

Discrepancy Number 7 : Carrier Not Defined on the Bill of Lading

The name of the carrier on the bill of lading is not defined and bill of lading is not signed by the master, the carrier or an agent on behalf of the carrier or master.

UCP 600 Article 20 indicates that:

A bill of lading, however named, must appear to:
i. indicate the name of the carrier and be signed by:
the carrier or a named agent for or on behalf of the carrier, or
the master or a named agent for or on behalf of the master.

Any signature by the carrier, master or agent must be identified as that of the carrier, master or agent.

Any signature by an agent must indicate whether the agent has signed for or on behalf of the carrier or for or on behalf of the master.

If banks could not locate the name of the carrier on the face of the bill of lading, then they mention this point as a discrepancy.

Example: Carrier Not Identified and Bill of Lading Not Signed As Per UCP 600 Discrepancy

Discrepancy Number 8 : Incorrect Description of Goods

Description of goods indicated on the invoice and other trade documents differs from the description of goods stated in the credit.

According to the international standard banking practice, the description of the goods, services or performance shown on the invoice is to correspond with the description shown in the credit.

There is no requirement for a mirror image. For example, details of the goods may be stated in a number of areas within the invoice which, when read together, represent a
description of the goods corresponding to that in the credit.

A goods description indicated on any other document may be in general terms not in conflict with the goods description in the credit.

If banks determine that the description of the goods not corresponding to the letter of credit, they raise incorrect description of goods discrepancy.

Example: Description of Goods Discrepancy

Discrepancy Number 9 : Incorrect Endorsement / Absence of Endorsement

Bill of lading, insurance policy or draft (bill of exchange) not endorsed by the beneficiary of the credit.

Discrepancy Number 10 : Partial Shipment or Transshipment Effected Despite L/C Terms

Exporters have to be very careful with the partial shipments and transshipments.

Please read credit text and determine if credit allowed or not allowed partial shipments and transshipments.

Example: Partial Shipment Discrepancy

Inspection Certificate Discrepancies

inspection certificate discrepancies

On this page you can find most common discrepancies related to the inspection certificate, which is issued under a typical letter of credit transaction.

Discrepancy can be defined as an error or defect, according to the issuing bank, in the presented documents compared with the documentary credit, the UCP 600 rules or other documents that have been presented under the same letter of credit.

Inspection in international trade can be defined as a process of checking the quality of goods against the contractual requirements.

Inspection certificate is the document that is usually issued by the inspection company after completion of the inspection.

Inspection certificate provides data on the result of the inspection.

Inspection Certificate Discrepancies

  • Inspection Certificate Not Issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of Credit
  • Total Quantity Indicated on the Certificate of Inspection is not in Accordance with the Bill of Lading and Certificate of Origin
  • Inspection Certificate Is not Dated within the Timeline Required by the Documentary Credit
  • Inspection Certificate Identifies Different Goods Inspected Inconsistent with Those Described by Commercial Invoices
  • Inspection Certificate Indicates That Goods Do not Comply with the specifications
  • Inspection Certificate Indicates That Packing is not as per L/C.
  • Pre-shipment Inspection Certificate Shows Date of Inspection a Later Date Than Date of Shipment

Important Points Regarding the Inspection Certificates under Letter of Credit Rules:

  • When a credit requires the presentation of an inspection certificate, this will be satisfied by the presentation of a signed document titled as inspection certificate, or bearing a similar title or even untitled, which fulfills its function by certifying the result of the indicated action, for example, the results of the inspection.
  • When a credit requires the presentation of a pre-shipment inspection certificate, which relates to an action required to take place on or prior to the date of shipment, the certificate must indicate:

a. an issuance date of the certificate is no later than the date of shipment; or
b. stating that the inspection of goods took place prior to, or on the date of shipment,
c. the exact title of the required certificate, such as, “Pre‐shipment Inspection Certificate”.

  • An inspection certificate should be issued by the institution stated in the credit.
  • When a letter of credit does not state the title of an issuer, any institution including the beneficiary could issue the inspection certificate.
  • When a letter of credit indicates specific requirements with respect to inspection, the data regarding the inspection mentioned on the inspection certificate should comply with those requirements.

Inspection Certificate Not issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of Credit Discrepancy

inspection certificate not issued as per letter of credit

Inspection in international trade can be defined as a process of checking the quality of goods against the contractual requirements.

Because, the importer and exporter are located in different countries, and they are usually living very away from each other, as a result it would not be feasible for the importer to send someone to check the quality of goods for each shipment.

If the importer (the applicant) is not able to send a person he trusts to the place of shipment, he can ask an internationally recognized inspection company, such as the Geneva-based Société Générale Surveillance (SGS) to perform the inspection required.

The applicant will instruct the inspection company as to the manner in which it is to check the goods and what they must look for. (1)

Third party inspection services in international trade can be grouped under two main categories.

  1. Previous Shipment Inspections, which are performed before the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory and
  2. Post Shipment Inspections, which are performed after the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory.

types of inspection

Inspections, which are performed before the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory are as follows:

  1. Pre-Production Inspection (PPI)
  2. During Production Inspection (DUPRO)
  3. Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI)
  4. Container Loading Supervision (CLS) or Container Loading Inspection (CLI)

Inspections, which are performed after the goods are shipped from the exporter’s factory are as follows:

  1. Post-Shipment Inspection (2)

Inspection certificate is the document that is issued by the inspection company after completion of the inspection. Inspection certificate provides data on the result of the inspection.

The inspection certificate should be issued by the party stated in the letter of credit.

According to the letter of credit rules and standard banking practices an inspection certificate, however named, must appear to be issued and signed by the entity stated in the letter of credit.

For example, if the letter of credit requires that pre-shipment inspection certificate should be issued by SGS, Intertek or CCIC Inspection Company, the inspection certificate that has been presented by the beneficiary must be issued and signed by one of these independent inspection companies.

If issuing bank finds out that an inspection certificate has not been issued and signed by the entity as required by the letter of credit, then the issuing bank will raise a discrepancy, which is known as inspection certificate not issued and signed by the party required by the letter of credit.

Letter of Credit Discrepancy Example: Inspection Certificate Not Issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of Credit

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 45A: Description of Goods and or Services: 20 mtons of %100 organic Italian Extra Virgin olive Oil. Delivery Terms: CIF Port of Newark, USA Incoterms 2010.

Field 46A: Documents Required:

  1. Beneficiary’s dated and manually signed commercial invoice in duplicates bearing full description of goods and its quantity, net and gross weight, unit and total price.
  2. Insurance policy covering all risks showing claims payable in USA.
  3. 3/3 full set original clean bills of lading made out to order of issuing bank, notify applicant company indicating freight prepaid stating the name, telephone and fax numbers of carrier’s agent in port of discharge. Bill of lading should evidence shipments made in refrigerated 40′ closed containers.
  4. The original inspection certificate issued not prior to marine bill of lading date by S.G.S or its authorized agent on S.G.S letter head certifying that the goods shipped/inspected are in conformity with the quality, quantity, and packing of the goods loaded are strictly complying with specifications of the goods indicated in the relative Purchasing Instruction, the terms of the l/c and all subsequent amendments as presented to S.G.S by the importer. The inspection certificate shall verify that the goods are in conformity with USDA organic food standards.

The beneficiary presented an insurance policy as shown on the below picture.

Inspection Certificate

Discrepancy Example: Inspection Certificate Not issued and Signed by the Party Required by the Letter of CreditDiscrepancy: Inspection certificate should have been issued by S.G.S or its authorized agent on behalf of S.G.S inspection company. On the other hand, the inspection certificate has been issued by another inspection company.

Reason for Discrepancy: According to letter of credit rules and standard banking practices an inspection certificate, however named, must appear to be issued and signed by the entity stated in the letter of credit.

References:

  1. Documentary Credits in Practice, Second edition 2009, Nordea, Page:174, Reached: 07.March.2018
  2. What is a Pre-Production Inspection (PPI)?, www.advancedontrade.com, Reached: 07.March.2018

Multimodal Bill of Lading Discrepancies

multimodal bill of lading discrepancies

Multimodal transportation is the movement of one unit load from origin to destination by several methods or transportation under one document without breaking up the unit load.

The development of container traffic has made this possible, as containers can travel from end to end without being opened/unloaded/reloaded during the course of the journey.

The advantage for those who make use of multimodal transportation is that they have one document only for the whole operation and that the operator is legally responsible for a satisfactory overall performance by his own staff and by the agents or branches that he is employing.(1)

Multimodal bill of lading is the transport document that covers at least two different modes of transport.

On this page you can find most common discrepancies related to the multimodal bills of lading under the letters of credit transaction.

Multimodal Bill of Lading Discrepancies

Important Definitions Regarding the Multimodal Bill of Lading under Latest Letter of Credit Rules:

  • According to latest UCP 600 letter of credit rules a multimodal bill of lading should not bear any indication that it is subject to charter party.
  • All original multimodal bills of lading printed by the carrier must be presented to the bank by the beneficiaries.
  • It is hard to prevent a transshipment in a multimodal transportation as a result even letter of credit prohibits transshipment multimodal bill of lading can state ‘Transshipment may/will take place.”
  • Multimodal bill of lading should be regarded as a negotiable transport document like a bill of lading if the last mode of shipment in the entire journey is completed by sea transportation.
  • More than one notify parties could be stated in a multimodal bill of lading.
  • ‘To Order’ or ‘To the order of shipper’ means that multimodal bill of lading should be endorsed by the shipper as per letter of credit instructions.

References:

  1. Shipping and Incoterms, Practice Guide, UNDP Practice Series, Page: 6

Multimodal Bill of Lading Does Not Cover At Least Two Different Modes of Transport Discrepancy

Multimodal Bill of Lading Does Not Cover At Least Two Different Modes of Transport Discrepancy

A transport document covering at least two different modes of transport is regarded as a multimodal bill of lading according to the letter of credit rules.

If the letter of credit asks for a multimodal bill of lading or a combined bill of lading, however named, the transport document which will be presented by the beneficiary must be covering at least two different modes of transport.

It is worth mentioning that the title of the transport document is irrelevant according to the letter of credit rules.

The transport document presented needs not to be titled “Multimodal bill of lading” or “Combined bill of lading” or words of similar effect even when the credit so names the required document.

The important point is the content of the transport document not the title.

Single Modes of Transport Examples:

Sample 1 : Shipment Effected From Melbourne Port, Australia to Port of Guangzhou, China

single mode of transport example 1

  • Transport Document Title: Multimodal Bill of Lading
  • Port of Loading: Port Melbourne, Australia
  • Port of Discharge: Port of Guangzhou, China

Only sea shipment has been effected.

This is a port to port marine bill of lading not a multimodal bill of lading.

 

Sample 2 : Shipment Effected From Changi Airport, Singapore to Narita Airport, Tokyo

Changi Airport, Singapore to Narita Airport, Tokyo

  • Transport Document Title : Combined Bill of Lading
  • Airport of Departure: Changi Airport, Singapore
  • Airport of Destination: Narita Airport, Tokyo

Only air shipment has been effected.

This transport document can be treated as an air waybill not a combined bill of lading.

 

Multimodal Transport Examples:

Sample 1 : Multimodal Shipment Effected via Land and Sea Shipments 

Multimodal Shipment Effected via Land and Sea Shipments Transport Document Title: Multimodal Bill of Lading
Place of Receipt: Zurich, Switzerland
Port of Loading: Port of Genoa, Italy
Port of Discharge: Jeddah Islamic Port, KSA

Land and sea shipment has been effected together.

This is a multimodal bill of lading.

If the issuing bank finds out that single mode of transport effected on the multimodal bill of lading, then the issuing bank will issue a discrepancy, which is known as multimodal bill of lading does not cover at least two different modes of transport.

Letter of Credit Discrepancy Example: Multimodal Bill of Lading Does Not Cover At Least Two Different Modes of Transport

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 44A: Place of Taking in Charge/Dispatch from …/Place of Receipt: Durban, South Africa

Field 44B: Place of Final Destination/For Transportation to …/Place of Delivery: Utrecht, Holland

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of multimodal transport document marked freight collect made out to order of Amsterdam Trade Bank marked notify applicant indicating that the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge or loaded on board.

The beneficiary presented a combined bill of lading with the following data:

Multimodal Bill of Lading

Port of Loading: Port Of Durban, South Africa

Port of Discharge: Rotterdam Port, Holland

Discrepancy: Multimodal bill of lading does not show at least two different modes of transport. Only sea transportation has been effected.

Reason for Discrepancy: A multimodal transport document must be covering at least two different modes of transport.

The essence of multimodal transport document is that it is evidencing at least two different modes of transport.

As an example, the multimodal bill of lading can show dispatch from an inland point, such as a road transportation from an inland point to the port of loading located in the country of export, and then consequent shipment by sea from port of loading to the port of discharge.

or any other combinations of different delivery places, so that at least two different modes of transport is utilized.

Unclean Multimodal Bill of Lading Presented Discrepancy

Unclean Multimodal Bill of Lading Presented Discrepancy

Banks accept only clean transport documents.

Banks do not accept any unclean transport document such as unclean bill of lading, unclean multimodal bill of lading, unclean charter party bil of lading, unclean road transport document, unclean air transport document, unclean sea waybill etc.

Letter of credit rules define clean transport document as follows: “A clean transport document is one bearing no clause or notation expressly declaring a defective condition of the goods or their packaging.”

There are two important points about the clean transport documents subject that everyone must know.

The first important point is that the word “clean” need not appear on a transport document, even if a credit has a requirement for that transport document to be “clean on board”.

The second important point is that only express clauses or notations on the transport documents would make them unclean.

If transport document is not to include a clause that expressly declare a defective condition of the goods or their packaging, then it is accepted as a clean transport document.

Sample Clauses That Make a Transport Document Unclean:

• Packaging is not sufficient for the sea journey
• Goods which improperly stored at the port of loading have been shipped on board partially wet and not in good condition.

Let us try to understand the subject with an example as below:

Letter of Credit Discrepancy Example: Unclean Multimodal Transport Document Presented Discrepancy

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 45A: Description of Goods and or Services: Furniture and Equipment

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of clean on board multimodal transport document marked freight collect made out to order of Commercial Bank of Ethiopia marked notify applicant indicating that the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge or loaded on board.

The beneficiary presented a multimodal transport bill of lading with the following clause:

Container is not properly closed and sealed, overloaded and packaging is not sufficient for the sea journey.

Multimodal Bill of Lading

Unclean multimodal bill of lading

Discrepancy: Unclean multimodal bill of lading presented.

Reason for Discrepancy: A bank will only accept a clean transport document. A clean transport document is one bearing no clause or notation expressly declaring a defective condition of the goods or their packaging.

Place of Receipt Different than the Letter of Credit Discrepancy

Place of Receipt on a Multimodal Bill of Lading Different than the Letter of Credit Discrepancy

Multimodal bill of lading is a type of transport document, that is used when the shipment covers at least two different modes of transport.

On a typical multimodal bill of lading, there are 4 different places exist in regards to delivery of goods:

  1. Place of Receipt: is the place where the goods are received from the shipper by the carrier, or its agent
  2. Port of Loading: is the place where the goods are received for marine transport by the Carrier
  3. Port of Discharge: is the place where the goods are to be discharged from the vessel
  4. Place of Delivery: is the place where the goods are delivered by the carrier to the buyer

According to the letter of credit rules, the multimodal bill of lading must indicate that goods have been taken in charge at the place stated in the letter of credit, by either a pre-printed wording or by a notation indicating the date on which the goods have been taken in charge.

If the issuing bank finds out that the place of receipt on the multimodal bill of lading is inconsistent with the letter of credit terms, then the issuing bank will issue a discrepancy, which is known as place of receipt different than the letter of credit.

Letter of Credit Discrepancy Example: Place of Receipt Different Than the Letter of Credit on the Multimodal Bill of Lading 

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP latest version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 44A: Place of Taking in Charge/Dispatch from …/Place of Receipt: SAO PAULO, BRAZIL

Field 44E: Port of Loading/Airport of Departure: SANTOS PORT, BRAZIL.

Field 44F: Port of Discharge/Airport of Destination: PORT OF FELIXSTOWE, UNITED KINGDOM

Field 44B: Place of Final Destination/For Transportation to …/Place of Delivery: IP1 3EE PINEWOOD, IPSWICH, UNITED KINGDOM

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of combined transport document issued by a shipping company marked freight collect made out to order of HSBC BANK marked notify applicant indicating that the goods have been dispatched, taken in charge or loaded on board.

The beneficiary presented a combined bill of lading with the following data:

Multimodal Bill of Lading

Field 44A: Place of Taking in Charge/Dispatch from …/Place of Receipt: RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL

Port of Loading: SANTOS PORT, BRAZIL

Port of Discharge: PORT OF FELIXSTOWE, UNITED KINGDOM

Place of Final Destination: IP1 3EE PINEWOOD, IPSWICH, UNITED KINGDOM

multimodal bill of lading place of receipt discrepancy

Discrepancy: Multimodal bill of lading shows a place of receipt different than the letter of credit.

Reason for Discrepancy: A multimodal bill of lading must indicate that goods have been dispatched or taken in charge at the place stated in the letter of credit.

Notify Different Than Letter of Credit Discrepancy

Notify Different Than Letter of Credit Discrepancy

Notify party is the institution, to whom the shipping company informs the arrival of the cargo.

A transport document covering at least two different modes of transport is regarded as a multimodal bill of lading according to the letter of credit rules.

The notify party field on the multimodal bill of lading can be completed mainly in 2 different ways.

  1. In most cases, the notify party is the applicant or the importer on the multimodal bill of lading.
  2. In some rare occasions, the applicant and the issuing bank are both required to be stated as notify parties on the multimodal bills of lading.

The notify party field can be seen on the following transport documents : Bill of lading, multimodal bill of lading, charter party bill of lading, sea waybill, air transport document (air waybill), road transport document (CMR) and rail transport document etc.

If the issuing bank finds out that the notify party field of a multimodal bill of lading has not been completed as per letter of credit terms, then the issuing bank will issue a discrepancy, which is known as notify party different than the letter of credit.

Letter of Credit Discrepancy Example: Notify Party Different Than Letter of Credit on a Multimodal Bill of Lading

A letter of credit has been issued in SWIFT format, subject to UCP Latest Version, with the following details:

Letter of Credit Conditions

Field 50: Applicant: Al Ghazali Sons Trading Co P.O. Box No. 3268, Alkhobar 31771 Saudi Arabia. Fax: (03) 8962022 Tel: (03) 8773344

Field 46A: Documents Required: Full set of ‘clean on board’ multimodal bill of lading issued by Applicant’s Forwarder M/S. Fast Transocean Intl. Ltd., issued to the order of Banque Saudi Fransi, Alkhobar, marked ‘freight collect’ and notify applicant, evidencing shipment from any port in Spain to Dammam Port, Saudi Arabia.

The multimodal bill of lading must show the name, address and telephone number of shipping agent at the port of discharge.

The beneficiary presented a multimodal bill of lading with the following data:

Multimodal Bill of Lading

Consignee: To the order of Banque Saudi Fransi, Alkhobar

Notify: Al-Bingazhi Trading Co. Ltd. P.O. Box No. 3118, Riyad 31551 Saudi Arabia. Fax: (03) 8964042 Tel: (03) 8775544

multimodal bill of lading notify party discrepancy

Discrepancy: Multimodal bill of lading shows a notify company which is different than what is required in the letter of credit.

Reason for Discrepancy: If a letter of credit states the details of notify parties such as company name and address, a multimodal transport document may also indicate the details of notify party.